Sunday, August 15, 2010

Forensic Auditing and Accounting

In the last several years, the term forensic auditing came into usage. What really does it specifically mean? The following article will discuss the importance of this process.
First off, let us define accounting. Accounting is the method of identifying, measuring, recording, and communicating economic information regarding an entity or an organization. This procedure permits informed judgments by users of the information. On the opposite side is forensic auditing which is a fairly new procedure under the field of auditing.
Crime was the reason why forensic auditing was born, most specifically economic crime. Economic crime has affected every country and industry and has escalated in recent times. The number of cases of fraud and corruption that are being reported has continued to grow. This is complicated by the challenges faced by the criminal justice system. Plus the general absence of the necessary skills to gather the proper audit evidence that is vital to criminal investigations.
According to information gathered from law enforcement and criminal justice agencies, the success rate for convictions are not good because prosecuting authorities lack skills and knowledge to provide effective investigation and prosecution. This is where forensic auditing comes in. Thus, forensic accounting gets its name from its association with a court of law. It is carried out to accomplish an objective that entails a judicial process.
An example of this is the computation of asset values in a divorce proceeding. Another is the assessment of damages due to the negligence of an auditor. Still another is fact-finding to see whether fraud had taken place, in what amount, and whether or not criminal proceedings are to be set off. And lastly, the collection of evidence in a criminal proceeding. Forensic accounting focuses primarily on both the evidence of financial transactions and reporting as found within an accounting system. It is the legal framework that allows such evidence to be suitable to the purpose of accounting.
Forensic accountants are chartered accountants that specialize in these types of cases and when there is a need for such evidence. Their job is to distinguish and interpret the evidences of both non-fraudulent and fraudulent transactions in the books and records of an accounting system. They also look out for the ensuing effect upon the accounts, inventories, and presentations. So, it is important that forensic accountants must first understand the regular accounting procedures and processes. In other words, forensic accounting is a specialization.
Are you in need of the services of a forensic loan auditor? Forensic auditing is a service that should only be done by professionals so don't settle for less.

Grant Proposals - Selecting a Funder Profile

One consistent reason is the high rejection rate of proposals caused by applicants who do not apply to the right funding agencies. It may sound obvious that this needs to be done, but in fact this is the first hurdle where many applicants fail. If you have had a grant proposal rejected, it may be that you are not properly researching Funder Profiles and mismatching elements of the criteria.
The geographical area and the demographic a funder wants to aid, is often the first mandate applicants overlook when screening Funder Profiles for a match. Or maybe they did look, but thought their program so worthwhile an exception may be made by the funder. This is not likely to happen. Funders do not have special case categories. They look for a very exact match when placing grants. So essentially, if you are a small business who wants to expand xyz program and you know this matches the information given by the Funder Profile, you may be surprised by a rejection. When asking for feedback, you may see that your program met all the criteria, and only failed because the operational plans were to expand in an urban area outside of the locality where you are based. This is the element of your program that conflicted with this particular funder's mandate. This is also a part of the criteria often not properly researched by applicants before submitting a proposal.
In order to avoid missing some essential information given by the funder, applicants will often take the first step of asking the funder for Submission Guidelines and Requests for Proposals (RFP) to research. These documents offer an enormous amount of time consuming information to go through, almost guaranteeing something will be missed. Especially if you have applied to several agencies or foundations. The easiest way to make an initial list of matching funders is to go through the summary profiles displayed on their sits and marketing brochures. Normally you will find enough information here to let you know if which funders may be a good fit for your program and worth further research.
Then look for a list of previous grantees. This gives some insight into the preferences of the funder and how closely your own program matches. Systematically go through your lists of funders, deselecting those whose initial criteria is a mismatch with your program. You will soon have a smaller and more manageable list of Funder Profiles to start seriously researching, saving yourself a lot of wasted time and effort. If you are unsure and do not have time to do the research work yourself, then contacting a Grant Consultant will produce much better results.
Breaking News Reviews provides short, no-jargon informational articles in response to frequently researched questions on the internet.
http://breakingnewsreviews.com/quick-hints-for-grant-writing-success/#more-115
http://breakingnewsreviews.com/